The juxtaposition of these two names is not intended to suggest the task of identifying and expounding upon dependencies and autonomies, similarities or differences, an originality or independence of one vis-à-vis the other.
Great piece. In Hegelian terms then, the question is what the content of the "contemporaneity of objective spirit" is (today) - i.e. what is the historical-political situation today?. For it seems to me a valid description of our epoch what Schmitt anticipates; this new class which Marx championed did "allow itself to be ensnared by the immense power and wealth of the capitalist world" and did end in basically what he writes in this paragraph (immiseration, lethargy and stupitidy).
Great piece. In Hegelian terms then, the question is what the content of the "contemporaneity of objective spirit" is (today) - i.e. what is the historical-political situation today?. For it seems to me a valid description of our epoch what Schmitt anticipates; this new class which Marx championed did "allow itself to be ensnared by the immense power and wealth of the capitalist world" and did end in basically what he writes in this paragraph (immiseration, lethargy and stupitidy).